An article about SEX and PROPERTY… what’s not to like?

 

Market Summary – House Prices

 
With so much movement in the UK and global markets, what’s been happening to the house prices in Bournemouth & Poole? As one would expect, my research indicates that not all towns and districts within the UK have performed the same and the results for the BH postcodes make positive reading, but only for certain property types. It’s important to understand your market to enable you to refine your buying criteria, especially when capital growth forecasting forms part of your wider goals.
 

Value Change:

Bournemouth – Last 5 years
 
All property types:    ↑17.15%
Detached:                   ↑22.14%
Semi-detached:         ↑13.68%
Terraced:                    ↑13.56%
Flats:                            ↑15.76%
 
Bournemouth – Last 12 months
 
All property types:   ↓00.58%
Detached:                  ↑03.51%
Semi-detached:        ↑00.77%
Terraced:                   ↓04.43%
Flats:                          ↓01.23%
 
Poole – Last 5 years
 
All property types:   ↑16.79%
Detached:                  ↑21.66%
Semi-detached:        ↑15.82%
Terraced:                   ↑15.42%
Flats:                           ↑13.96%
 
Poole – Last 12 months
 
All property types:   ↓01.16%
Detached:                  ↑03.79%
Semi-detached:        ↓03.71%
Terraced:                   ↓01.04%
Flats:                          ↓03.28%
 
This research shows that there’s been a healthy capital growth for all property types over the last five years. Over this period the average house price in Bournemouth has increased by circa £44,000 and by £52,000 in Poole. But during the last 12 months, the figures show that BH has experienced a marginal fall in values across most property types. Detached houses are the only property type in Bournemouth and Poole that has continued to show a positive growth over what appears to be a sluggish 12 months for property prices generally.
 

Conclusion

I put these results down to various contributing factors.
 
1) Landlords leaving the market due to Section 24.
2) Reduced demand from Buy-to-Let investors due to higher SDLT.
3) Help-to-Buy incentives enabling home buyers to purchase at higher values.
4) Uncertainty due to Brexit which has made buyers more cautious and make lower offers to buffer a potential decline in prices.
 
What is still abundantly clear is that property has always and still continues to perform well over the long term. I don’t think it makes financial sense to make a knee jerk reaction; like selling an asset, because of micro movements. If your property portfolio is unencumbered or leveraged debt from a buy-to-let mortgage is serviceable, then the odd downward movement in prices doesn’t justify a good reason to sell. Many of the landlords that have exited the market over the past 18 months have had good reason to do so, which has had nothing to do with Brexit or fears of a market crash. There are many landlords that can’t service their leveraged debt and they have begun to feel the pinch of Section 24 as we enter the third phase of these tax changes.
 
Section 24 has triggered an increase in market appraisals (aka valuations) for landlords considering a sale of their asset/s. Many still aren’t sure whether it’ll affect them or not and in most cases, landlords will see no change to their bottom line. I would urge anyone to seek the appropriate financial advice from a qualified accountant and/or property tax specialist before making any decisions. If you’d like a copy of a spreadsheet that could give you some swift answers then please don’t hesitate to ask me for a template. Here’s a link to a video I made a while ago which gives some examples of these tax changes: Watch My Video About Section 24
 

Houses

There were more detached houses purchased over the last 12 months than any other property type in the Poole Borough. Circa 1600 detached houses were purchased in Poole and Bournemouth over the past 12 months, compared to 750 semi’s and 492 terrace homes. This would indicate that there is no shortage in demand for larger family homes and where demand exceeds supply, prices will continue to rise.
 

Are we buying more detached homes because we’re having more sex?

My extended research established that people are “doing it” more in Bournemouth than ever before. The number of births has been rising since the mid 70’s when 1000 or so births per year were the average. We’re now popping out circa 2200 babies per year in Bournemouth, an increase of 220%! Perhaps people were more interested in Led Zeppelin, David Bowie and Pink Floyd back then, rather than having children? Haven’t the residents of Bournemouth been watching Game Of Thrones in the evenings? But in all seriousness, my findings indicate that it could have more to do with Tax Credits than anything else. Yes, that’s right, it appears that we started to breed significantly more when changes occurred to child tax credits in the early 2000’s. By 2003 the rate of child benefit for the first child increased by 25.3 per cent and the rate for subsequent children by 3.1 per cent in real terms. We were delivering around 1500 births per year between 1985 and 2003 on the old system, but then the average number of births saw a spike when the new child tax credits came in. The number of births in Bournemouth went up by circa 116 year on year until 2009, where we began to average out at circa 2200 births per year.
 
I’d hate to think that people are having more children because of the current tax system, but the facts would back up this theory. It’s certainly not doing any harm to the prices of detached houses, but I can’t help but think, is it for love or money?

David Giles

Is it cheaper to rent or buy a house?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The BIG question….

is it cheaper to rent or pay a mortgage?

Obviously, one would have to compare the cost on the same property to arrive at a fair comparison.

Here’s an example based on house prices and rental property values in Poole/Bournemouth in Dorset:

Example:

Dave owns a property worth £300,000 and he has £100,000 of equity, therefore, he has a £200,000 mortgage loan.

The mortgage loan is a capital repayment mortgage with monthly payments of £800.

So, Dave owns a £300,000 house and it costs him £800 per month to live in it.

Would it cost Dave less or more if he sold it to a landlord and rented it back?

Dave sells his house to a landlord for £300,000 and pays off the £200,000 mortgage loan. The market rent is £1000 per month (£200 more than the mortgage he used to pay). The rent is £200 MORE per month BUT Dave has £100,000 in the bank. He invests his £100,000 and earns 12% pa (£1000 per month). Dave can now pay the full rent of £1000 per month with the interest he’s earning from his £100,000.

So, Dave is now effectively living in his rented home for free. He still lives in a house worth £300,000 and isn’t having to find the £800 per month mortgage payments.

Roughly, £550 of his mortgage payments were paying off his £200,000 loan, therefore, this wasn’t actually a cost as such, however, he is still £250 per month better off.

Although Dave has £250 extra in his pocket every month, he is losing out on the capital growth (how much his own property may have increased by). If his property didn’t increase by more than 1% that year, then he would be in no worse position by renting. He also has the flexibility of living in different properties in various locations; perhaps worldwide, which might be attractive if his work can be done from a phone and a laptop.

There are always going to be pro’s and con’s but I think Dave’s example demonstrates that renting doesn’t look too bad at all!

Thoughts?

David Giles – Founder of EMBARQ

#property #renting #buying #poole #bournemouth #christchurch #dorset #houseprices #rentingvsbuying #mortgages #firsttimebuyer

50% CAPITAL GAINS TAX RELIEF FOR LANDLORDS!!!

The Chancellor will be delivering the 2018 Budget on Monday 29th October (tomorrow) and I for one eagerly await the announcements.

I’m particularly interested in the Tories consideration of introducing a 100% CGT (capital gains tax) relief for those selling rental properties to their tenants. As long as the tenant has been in the property for 3 years or longer, 50% of the saving would remain with the landlord and the other 50% would be used as part of the tenants purchasing deposit. As an advocate, promoter and facilitator of enabling home-ownership for tenants, I’m really hoping that this proposal comes to fruition.
The current rules state that landlords who sell a rental property are liable to pay capital gains tax on any profits they make. If this amount is within the basic income tax band they’ll pay 18% or 28% on any amount above the basic tax rate.

With the typical gain per property being circa £15,000, this example would gift a first-time-tenant-buyer with £7,500. This figure will range significantly case by case and it’s expected that this average figure is likely to be around three times this amount in locations like London. Some landlords won’t have seen any equity growth, therefore, won’t have any gains to contribute to this proposed scheme. Seasoned landlords on the other hand that have benefited from decades of house price growth; and/or that have made shrewd acquisitions, could be subject to hefty a relief, which could become a significant windfall for both themselves and their tenants.

As with all changes and proposals to alter tax/legislation, I’ve given this scheme some in-depth thought, in particular to those landlords with mighty gains that have already extracted their profits through remortgaging. These particular landlords could face difficulties in passing over the obligated tenant-buyers deposit contribution because if they’ve already spent or reinvested the money and don’t have the required portion to pass over to the tenant-buyer, the scheme could be flawed.

I’m not totally convinced that this proposed capital gains tax relief will incentivise enough landlords to sell their properties to their tenants. Firstly, buy-to-let is a long-term investment and those that have to sell are probably less likely to have decent gains to make this a viable scheme. Secondly, more than 50% of landlords are unencumbered (have mortgage-free assets) therefore, they are not affected by the phased section 24 changes to mortgage interest rate relief, thus, no pressure to sell-off rental stock like those that are highly geared and/or with higher interest rates to service. I think a more efficient, win-win and “catch all” strategy that would make the merits of this scheme more viable, would be to refund the stamp duty levy for additional properties and establish a tax relief on the rental income for the provision of longer tenancies. The negative of this revised proposal could perhaps incentivise too many landlords to dis-invest from the rental investment arena, thus decreasing the supply of rented homes. This could leave many people in limbo; perhaps increase homelessness, and/or prolong the burden to parents to provide somewhere to live. With the current average age of first-time buyers already at 30 years old, parents may need to consider buying a home with two annexes, one for their own parents and one for their kids!

Feel free to discuss.

____________________________________________________________________

Contact EMBARQ for any consultancy and/or real estate services.

Office HQ: 01202 930 930

Email: HQ@EMBARQ.CO.UK

DAVID GILES (The Property Guy), Founder of EMBARQ, Property Investment Consultant, Letting Agent, Public Speaker, Landlord, Proud Dad, Rubbish Golfer, Ten Pin Bowling Legend, Author of The Property Guy Blog

#Budget #Budget2018 #UK #Brexit #Economics #Deal #NoDeal